卢正康律师亲办案例
继承房产纠纷--继承、婚姻律师
来源:卢正康律师
发布时间:2012-06-06
浏览量:1638

案例内容概述:

被继承人留有动迁房一处。被继承人没有婚生子女,生前与第一任丈夫收养一女即是本案的原告。被继承人的第一任丈夫辞世后,被继承人改嫁给第二任丈夫,这时候本案原告早已成家单过,没有和被继承人生活在一起,被继承人与第二任丈夫也没有婚生子女,生活极其单调乏味,于是将本案原告的婚生女收养为养孙女,该养孙女即是本案的被告,本案继承房产争议双方系母女关系。

被继承人的第二任丈夫与被继承人先后去世,留有一套动迁房,现该套动迁房已经拆迁不复存在,该套动迁房已经回迁到现在的诉争房,该诉争房产是本案的标的物。该诉争房是动迁房的回迁房,但回迁房的价值远远大于动迁房,是增加给付现金后取得的该诉争房产。

本案争议焦点

该诉争房产只是存在《房屋买卖合同》和购房三联单票据,这种情况是否能够确定房屋产权所有权人,是否能确定为被继承人的房产。

案例分析

一、本案诉争房产不是某某的遗产,不能够将其作为遗产进行继承分配。某某的遗产应该是被拆迁房的作价款182909元。

该案件争议标的物为滨江凤凰城小区房屋。但该诉争房产没有《房屋产权所有权证》,因此其房屋所有权人并没有依法确定。虽然该套房有《购房合同》和三联单缴费票据,但其并不能说明该套房屋产权的归属问题,也就是说该套房产不能依法确定为某某的,因此也就不能做为某某的遗产进行处理。

本案被继承人某某生前与其第一任丈夫无婚生子女,因此收养了一养女即是本案的原告某某,某某也因养父的姓氏而姓张。1971年被继承人的第一任丈夫辞世,当时原告已经26岁长大成人并已经结婚单过。1973年被继承人改嫁给某某,1992年某某去世,留有其公有住房一处,1993年该套公产房变更承租权人为某某。 1997年该套公产房进行房改房出售,通过该房买断花费人民币78120元成为了被继承人的私产房。2006年该套房产因城市规划被拆迁,该套被拆迁房作价182909元,但如果回迁到现在的诉争房即滨江凤凰城小区房,将要补缴人民币317227元,该补缴资金由被告出资。因该诉争房屋没有确定被继承人某某是房屋所有权人,而且购买该诉争房的大部分资金317227元是由被告出资的,因此该套房产不能作为某某遗产进行继承,依据以上事实代理人认为,被继承人的遗产仅限于该被拆迁房拆迁时的作价即182909元作为遗产。

二、本案的被告是养孙女,依据法律规定是合法继承人。

1973年被继承人改嫁第二任丈夫某某,夫妻二人住在哈尔滨市道外区南新街即本案的被拆迁房,婚后夫妻二人没有与原告共同生活,因被继承人与其第二任丈夫没有生育,二人生活寂寞单调,1984年夫妻二位老人将原告的婚生女儿即本案被告收养为养孙女,并接其到自家居住,当时被告刚刚12岁。1988年被告的户籍迁到其住址,正式确立了收养关系。依据1985年法发22号〈依据最高人民法院关于贯彻执行《中华人民共和国继承法》若干问题的意见〉第22条的规定\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\收养他人为养孙子女,视为养父母与养子女的关系的,可互为第一顺序继承人\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\。依据以上事实与法律规定,代理人认为,《中华人民共和国收养法》是1992年4月1日实施的,但本案原告被被继承人第一任丈夫收养,以及本案被告被被继承人与第二任丈夫收养均是在该法实施之前的收养行为,因此不应该适用该部法律规定确定收养关系,而在当时年代形成的是事实收养关系,既然原告作为养女是继承人之一,那么被告因其户籍、生活均与被继承人在一起并且形成事实收养关系,因此也是继承人之一。

三、本案被拆迁房已经赠予给被告。

1992年被继承人的第二任丈夫去世,其除了被继承人和被告外,没有其他亲人。此时本案被告已经20岁长大成人,1993年被继承人让被告办理公房承租权更名手续,明确提出,其第二任丈夫留下的南新街公产房一直就说要给被告,要求被告自己去办理承租权人为被告的名下,但被告考虑被继承人老年丧偶的悲痛心情,且更名需交纳300多元费用,于是被告自作主张将该房承租人变更为被继承人名下。

1997年该公产房买断变为被继承人的私有房屋。1999年8月本案被告结婚,同年带着被继承人去上海工作生活。在上海生活工作期间,被告与被继承人曾回到哈尔滨、并会同在哈尔滨生活的原告、被告之父(该人与原告1965年结婚,1993年离婚)共同去公证处办理赠予手续,即是将被继承人买断后的私产房赠予给被告,结果因手续繁琐,被告急于回上海工作而没有办完,被告的父亲、兄弟姊妹等家人包括本案原告在内都知道此赠与行为,是公开的事实,也都是认可的事实。

针对该套公产房及买断后变成私产房,其承租权人或所有权人均同意赠予给被告,但没有办理房屋产权过户,因此没有完成房屋赠予行为,但后来该套房子被拆迁,该套房产被作价人民币182909元,并且该笔款与被告出资人民币317227元合在一起购买了现在的诉争房。该房购买后,因大部分资金是被告出资,因此事实上一直是被告支配控制的:委托其父亲代为买卖、代为办理进户手续、委托对外租赁、委托其代为缴纳物业费等各项事务。依据以上事实,代理人认为,2006年被拆迁房作价182909元可以做为被继承人遗产,但该房在作价182909元后,被继承人事实行为同意与被告的出资共同购买现在的诉争房,其2010年去世后,也没对其享有的182909元该笔款另行做出遗嘱处分,同时有先前的赠予行为,因此代理人认为事实上被继承人对被拆迁房作价款182909元进行了事实处分,完成了赠予给被告的赠与行为。

该诉争房产在办理购买、进户等手续的时侯,因被告和被继承人在上海生活,被告委托其父亲代为办理,原告追随被告之父也办理了一些事务,后被告给了原告500元钱交通费用,这说明原告明知该套房产是被告实际支配并为其所有的。

四、该诉争房在签订《房屋认购协议书》及三联单发票上写的是被继承人的名字,但并不能据此确认该套房屋所有权人是被继承人的。

《房屋认购协议书》及三联单发票上签的都是被继承人的名字,但该名字都是被告的父亲代签的,且被告之父是接受被告的委托签订房屋购买合同,包括后期签订进户手续、物业管理合同等,均是接受被告的委托办理的。依据法律规定,代理人的行为后果是由委托人承担的,即是由委托人被告承担的。被继承人的名字只是挂个名而已,因合同等手续不是被继承人本人签字,又没有其授权,购买该套诉争房产只是出资182909元,因此无法确定其是该房屋权利的享受主体。

现实生活在房屋购买实践中,开发商与购买人签订买卖合同时,一般不会审查某某人是否接受他人的委托购房,只要购房人缴纳房款就会给购房人留有该套购买房。至于后期办理过户手续,得开具正式的发票,这时的正式发票一般是可以变更原三联单发票上的名字的,而且只有这种正式发票才可以办理房屋产权证照,发票上名字的更改也就是对购买合同的购买主体进行了变更。而本案被告与被继承人是同一户籍同一住所,因此是被拆迁房的回迁居民,而且房款大部分是被告出资的,变更发票变更合同签约当事人是完全可以做到的。依据我国法律规定,通常情况下,确定房屋所有权人的唯一标准是持有《中华人民共和国房屋所有权证》,因此本案中合同和三联单发票不能确定房屋所有权归属,更不可能确定为被继承人的遗留房产。

五、本案原告名义上是被继承人的养女,但没有尽任何赡养义务,因此依法不能继承遗产。

原告虽是被继承人与其第一任丈夫之养女,在被继承人第一任丈夫过世后,其留有的房屋一处已经给了原告。被继承人改嫁后,第二任丈夫遗留给被继承人的房产已经不复存在,已经因该房拆迁变成了现金人民币182909元。被继承人与第二任丈夫生活期间,原告从来也没有与被继承人一起生活过,也从来没有对被继承人赡养过,相反对被继承人的生活起居不闻不问,关系已经非常恶劣,虽然名义上是养母女关系,但母女亲情已经名存实亡。被继承人的退休金也是被告委托其父在哈尔滨每年支取并给付被继承人,由此可见,原告与被继承人的关系非常恶劣。 本案被告自1984年与被继承人一起生活至被继承人去世共同生活了26年,且1999年8月被告结婚去上海生活,原告不予以接纳照顾被继承人,被继承人无着落,被告遂将被继承人带到上海一起居住,并予以照顾扶养至2010年去世十几年。

依据以上事实,原告与被继承人的第二任丈夫没有形成收养关系,即使是名义上的继承人,因其没有尽任何赡养义务,因此依据《中华人民共和国继承法》第十三条第四款的规定\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\有扶养能力和有扶养条件的继承人,不尽扶养义务的,分配遗产时,应当不分或者少分\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\。

六、请法院依法确认本案诉争房不是被继承人的遗产,驳回原告之诉讼请求。

基于以上事实与理由,本案被告认为原告与被继承人再婚后的生活没有形成收养事实,名义上的养女原告对被继承人又置之不理,没有尽到任何赡养义务,因此依法应该不分割其182909元的遗产,而这部分遗产客观情况形成了被继承人赠予给被告的事实。又该诉争房也是被告出大部分资金购买的,并且该诉争房已经交付其管理经营多年,理应归其完全支配所有。既然该诉争房不是遗产,请法院依法驳回原告之诉讼请求,并赔偿被告因该诉讼产生的交通费、误工费等经济损失。

法院判决结果

法院采纳律师的代理意见,驳回了原告的诉讼请求。

                                                                 

以上内容由卢正康律师提供,若您案情紧急,找法网建议您致电卢正康律师咨询。
卢正康律师主办律师
帮助过2444好评数14
  • 咨询解答快
哈尔滨市嵩山路91号\\嵩山路与黄河路交口
LAWYER INFORMATION
律师信息
  • 律师姓名:
    卢正康
  • 执业律所:
    黑龙江佳鹏律师事务所
  • 职  务:
    主办律师
  • 执业证号:
    23010*********
CONTACT ME
联系本人
  • 服务地区:
    黑龙江-哈尔滨
  • 地  址:
    哈尔滨市嵩山路91号\\嵩山路与黄河路交口